A hub-and-spoke design for ultra-cold COVID-19 vaccine distribution.

An orderly and effective vaccination campaign is essential in combating the global COVID-19 pandemic. As one of the pioneers, the U.S. Center for Disease Control proposes a phased plan to promote the vaccination process. This plan starts with vaccinating the high-priority population in Phase 1, then turns to the remainder of the public in Phase 2, and ends with a scale-back network in Phase 3. The phased plan not only provides a sense of hope to impacted communities that this global pandemic can be defeated, but can serve as a template for other countries. To enhance this plan, this paper develops a generalizable framework for designing a hub-and-spoke vaccination dispensing network to achieve the goals in the Phase 2, which aims to expand the vaccination coverage for the general public. We introduce a new coverage index to measure the priority of different potential dispensing sites based on geo-data and develop an optimization model for network design. The hub-and-spoke network enhances the accessibility of the vaccines to various communities and helps to overcome the challenges related to ultra-cold storage facility shortage. A case study of Middlesex County in New Jersey is presented to demonstrate the application of the framework and provide insights for the Phase 2. Results from the baseline scenario show that increasing the driving time limit from 10 min to 25 min can improve the total coverage index from 40.8 to 55.9. Additionally, we explore how the changes of parameters impact the network design and discuss potential solutions for some special cases. When we allow 4 outreach nodes per hub, all potential 45 outreach points can be covered in the vaccination network within a 20-minute drive, and the total coverage index reaches its maximum value of 58.3.

Mental health among healthcare workers and other vulnerable groups during the COVID-19 pandemic and other coronavirus outbreaks: A rapid systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Although most countries and healthcare systems worldwide have been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, some groups of the population may be more vulnerable to detrimental effects of the pandemic on mental health than others. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesise evidence currently available from systematic reviews on the impact of COVID-19 and other coronavirus outbreaks on mental health for groups of the population thought to be at increased risk of detrimental mental health impacts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of reviews on adults and children residing in a country affected by a coronavirus outbreak and belonging to a group considered to be at risk of experiencing mental health inequalities. Data were collected on symptoms or diagnoses of any mental health condition, quality of life, suicide or attempted suicide. The protocol for this systematic review was registered in the online PROSPERO database prior to commencing the review (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=194264). RESULTS: We included 25 systematic reviews. Most reviews included primary studies of hospital workers from multiple countries. Reviews reported variable estimates for the burden of symptoms of mental health problems among acute healthcare workers, COVID-19 patients with physical comorbidities, and children and adolescents. No evaluations of interventions were identified. Risk- and protective factors, mostly for healthcare workers, showed the importance of personal factors, the work environment, and social networks for mental health. CONCLUSIONS: This review of reviews based on primary studies conducted in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic shows a lack of evidence on mental health interventions and mental health impacts on vulnerable groups in the population.